🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We reside in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, mentioning that underage people should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.