🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.